SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGYWhen an individual holds two contradicting thoughts at the same prison term the resulting situation is defined as Cognitive racket . The scheme of Cognitive haphazardness was premier proposed by psychologist Leon Festinger in 1956 who utter that when an individual experiences illegitimate enterprise then(prenominal) he or she withal experiences the oblige to reduce or remove the dissonance and that the intensity of the air pressure to reduce or remove the dissonance is a function of the dissonance experiencedIn the present investigate , the scheme throw away forth by Festinger is that the magnitude of dissonance is maximum when the pressure to reduce or remove it is the least and it would decrease if the pressure increases In other words , if in that respect are rewards or punishment accustomed to a mortal to say something that is adverse to his opinion , then he allow attempt to counter tilt the opinion so that it matches with his actions . The tendency to change his opinion to eccentric his overt behavior give be maximum when the rewards or punishment is not big and will be lower limit when the rewards are maximumIn the experiment conducted by Stanford University to prove the hypothesis , lxx whizz male students were asked to be arenas in this experiment which dealt with the bill of performance . When this experiment was to set more or less it was announced that later the bound of the experiment , the shells would be cry out into questi wholenessd for a feedback on the experiment so as to emend the experiment in the future . When a report came into the path , the experimenter stated that the undertaking would last for much than an hour and by and by that another person might interview the character on his views about the experiment and then the tas k was set in the first place the subject .

Two monotonous tasks were to be performed , in the first half hour the subject had to confide 12 spools on a tray , remove the spools and repeat the edge while in the second half hour he was to turn individually peg placed on a tray counter right-handed turn by turn . after(prenominal) completing the experiment the experimenter explained to the subject that there were two groups , one where they had no idea about the experiment and the other who were presumption an idea about the experiment by a look assistant they had appointed and they had to equate the results between the two sets of subjects . The experime nter then asked the subject to wait for the interviewer who precious a feedback . While the subject was waiting for the interviewer , the experimenter came back and asked him if he would fill in for the look assistant who was absent and render positive remarks about the experiment to the undermentioned person and for this the subject would be paid . barely , some subjects were not given the task of explaining the experiment to the next subject . Thus the experiment was conducted under three conditions , one control condition where the subject was directly taken to the interviewer after the experiment , second where the...If you requirement to get a secure essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.